Skip to main content
Home
Snurblog — Axel Bruns

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Information
  • Blog
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Presentations
  • Press
  • Creative
  • Search Site

Polarisation

Snurb — Wednesday 17 July 2024 23:36

Dimensions in the Unsubstantiated Claims of ‘Anti-Conservative Bias’ Made by Right-Wing Social Media Users

Politics | Government | Polarisation | Social Media | Twitter | SM&S 2024 |

The third speaker in this Social Media & Society 2024 session is Jeeyun Sophia Baik, whose interest is in the long-standing allegations of anti-conservative bias that have been made against social media platforms. Such claims have been embraced prominently by Donald Trump and other far-right actors, in particular, and some US politicians have even attempted to ban what they understand as ‘social media censorship’.

The problem is that claims of anti-conservative bias have been proven to be unfounded by a range of studies, and that there is in fact a substantial platforming of conservative and far-right voices by social media …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Saturday 13 July 2024 13:54

The Twitter That Was: Reflections on Ten Years of #auspol (SM&S 2024)

Politics | Elections | Government | Polarisation | Social Media | Social Media Network Mapping | Twitter | ARC Future Fellowship | Dynamics of Partisanship and Polarisation in Online Public Debate (ARC Laureate Fellowship) | SM&S 2024 |
» continue reading...
Snurb — Saturday 13 July 2024 13:38

Political Debates in Third Spaces? Football Fan Communities and the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar (IAMCR 2024)

Government | Polarisation | Politics | Dynamics of Partisanship and Polarisation in Online Public Debate (ARC Laureate Fellowship) | Facebook | IAMCR 2024 | Social Media |
» continue reading...
Snurb — Saturday 13 July 2024 13:33

'If you don't know, vote no': Symptoms of Destructive Polarisation in the 2023 Voice to Parliament Referendum in Australia (IAMCR 2024)

Politics | Elections | Government | Polarisation | Journalism | Industrial Journalism | Social Media | Facebook | Social Media Network Mapping | Dynamics of Partisanship and Polarisation in Online Public Debate (ARC Laureate Fellowship) | IAMCR 2024 |

IAMCR 2024

‘If you don’t know, vote no’: Symptoms of Destructive Polarisation in the 2023 Voice to Parliament Referendum in Australia

Axel Bruns, Tariq Choucair, Sebastian Svegaard, Samantha Vilkins, Katharina Esau, and Laura Vodden

  • 1 July 2024 – Paper presented at the IAMCR 2024 conference, Christchurch

Presentation Slides

» continue reading...
Snurb — Thursday 4 July 2024 12:57

European Scenarios for Future Conflicts

Politics | Polarisation | IAMCR 2024 |

The final speaker in this final session at IAMCR 2024 is, appropriately enough, outgoing IAMCR President Nico Carpentier, whose interest is in expert imaginings of the future of conflict and communication technologies. He begins by outlining the patterns of conflict in a very broad sense. Such conflict can be agonistic or antagonistic, and towards the antagonistic side there may be increasingly violent grey zone conflicts, armed conflicts, or hybrid conflicts – and the latter then also move beyond the realm of democratically acceptable conflicts.

Media play a critical role in all such conflicts, of course; media and communication technologies are …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Wednesday 3 July 2024 15:45

Responses to Disinformation by the Leading Candidates in the 2022 Brazilian Election

Politics | Elections | Government | Polarisation | ‘Fake News’ | Social Media | IAMCR 2024 |

The final IAMCR 2024 session for today is in disinformation and polarisation, and starts with Ivan Paganotti’s presentation on institutional communication by the leading candidates’ campaign Websites in the 2022 Brazilian election. In particular, he is interested in whether and how they tried to respond to electoral disinformation, and whether they had policies to curtail such disinformation once in office.

Data collection focussed especially on the period between the first and second rounds of the election, and examined any attempts at fact-checking electoral disinformation as well as responses to the federal administration’s social media guidelines.

The Lula and PT campaign episodically attempted to contest every new piece of what it considered to be false information, and also structurally debated the overall impact of disinformation on the political process. But its own efforts to promote ‘fact-checks’ of false information largely focussed on amplifying the responses from partisan trade unions and other organisations that were close to its own political interests.

The Bolsonaro and PL campaign avoided any discussion of disinformation; the term did not appear on the PL Website, and Bolsonaro himself did not have a Website of his own (only social media accounts). Bolsonaro only generally complained about being the victim of various ‘lies’ by his opponents, deflecting criticism directed at him and questioning the very existence of ‘fake news’ as a meaningful category.

Neither of these two strategies are especially productive; neither make a meaningful contribution to the fight against mis- and disinformation. They also do not align with the federal guidelines against disinformation published by the previous Rousseff and Bolsonaro administrations.

» continue reading...
Snurb — Wednesday 3 July 2024 10:09

Political Discussions in Facebook Football Fan Groups during the 2022 Qatar World Cup

Politics | Polarisation | Social Media | Facebook | IAMCR 2024 |

The final speaker in this IAMCR 2024 session is my excellent QUT colleague Tariq Choucair, presenting our work on the discussions of the 2022 Qatar World Cup by online football communities (slides are below). This draws on the theory of third spaces: primarily apolitical spaces where political talk can emerge and often takes place in a more congenial, respectful manner. This means they have democratic potential: discussion there may be able to avoid political disagreement and the avoidance of political talk.

We apply this concept to the case of the Qatar World Cup, which was highly controversial for the Qatari …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Wednesday 3 July 2024 10:07

Reactions to Gender Diversity in US Television Advertising

Politics | Polarisation | IAMCR 2024 | Television |

The next speaker in this IAMCR 2024 session is Kenton Wilkinson, whose interest is the presence of biracial couples and mixed-race families in US television advertising. Such diversity is becoming a new flashpoint in current culture wars in the country.

There is a long history of such culture wars in the US, but they have ramped up much further in recent years. In Texas, where Kenton is based, this has been especially pronounced, not least also in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic; the current Texas governor Greg Abbott has been at the forefront of implementing a number of especially …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Wednesday 3 July 2024 10:05

Discussions about Decolonisation in Kazakhstan Following the Russian Attack on Ukraine

Politics | Government | Polarisation | Social Media | Facebook | IAMCR 2024 |

The next speaker in this IAMCR 2024 session is Nazira Bairbek, whose focus is on the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on Kazakhstan; some Russian users in Kazakhstan responded to the invasion by asking Putin to annex Kazakhstan as well, for instance, while many Kazakh people took the side of Ukraine and feared Russian aggression against their own country.

This reflects the complicated post-colonial nature of many post-Soviet nations; they have fought for their independence from Russian influence since 1991, but maintain close relationships with Russia, and some people in these countries believe that they cannot survive without …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Wednesday 3 July 2024 10:04

Factors in Hong Kong Residents’ Online Discussion of the Chinese National Symbols Ordinance

Politics | Government | Polarisation | Social Media | IAMCR 2024 |

The next speaker in this IAMCR 2024 session is Caixie Tu, whose interest is in Hong Kong residents’ discussions about government ordinances on social media. The key question here is who speaks out on social media, and for what reasons.

Users’ cognitive responses can mediate such processes; this may include news attention, news knowledge, information elaboration, and other aspects, and engagement with heterogeneous information sources may be especially important. Individuals’ issue involvement, which may be value-relevant or outcome-relevant, may also affect their level of engagement in such debates.

How do the two types of issue involvement mediate the influence of …

» continue reading...

Pagination

  • Previous page
  • 12
  • Next page
Polarisation
INFORMATION
BLOG
RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS
PRESENTATIONS
PRESS
CREATIVE

Recent Work

Presentations and Talks

Beyond Interaction Networks: An Introduction to Practice Mapping (ACSPRI 2024)

» more

Books, Papers, Articles

Untangling the Furball: A Practice Mapping Approach to the Analysis of Multimodal Interactions in Social Networks (Social Media + Society)

» more

Opinion and Press

Inside the Moral Panic at Australia's 'First of Its Kind' Summit about Kids on Social Media (Crikey)

» more

Creative Work

Brightest before Dawn (CD, 2011)

» more

Lecture Series


Gatewatching and News Curation: The Lecture Series

Bluesky profile

Mastodon profile

Queensland University of Technology (QUT) profile

Google Scholar profile

Mixcloud profile

[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence]

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Licence.