A few weeks ago some of my colleagues and I were invited to contribute to a collection of articles on 360info that discusses 'the age of anger': the rise of angry, polarised, uncompromising views in public debate. You can find the full collection on the 360info site.
For me, this was a useful prompt for an (occasionally angry) article that takes aim at a number of typical fallacies in public debate, from the nonsensical 'echo chamber' hypothesis to the 'anxious generation' claims that underpin Australia's (and now, other countries') disastrous attempts to ban young people from social media.
Here …












