Blog

The final speakers at the Social Media Access Days at the German National Library for today are Oliver Watteler and Jan Schwalbach, whose interest is in the legal conditions for sharing platform data; platforms’ developer policies and Terms of Service are in constant flux, so it is important to keep track of how they evolve over time.

Researchers often have a strong interest in sharing the datasets they have collected with others; data sharing aids replicability, speeds up the research process, and enables new work. But researchers are rarely aware of the frameworks the platforms have imposed on such sharing …

And the next speaker at the Social Media Access Days at the German National Library is Beatrice Cannelli, whose interest is in how national memory institutions’ social media archiving initiatives have been affected by changing data access regimes. Such activities are affected by national legal frameworks, available resources, collection policies and scope, technical limitations, and the Terms of Service of the various platforms.

The latter are justified by user privacy concerns and the protection of sensitive information, but in practice mostly protect the platforms’ own business interests. How these are formulated influences the extent to which content from such platforms …

The post-lunch session at the Social Media Access Days at the German National Library starts with LK Seiling and Sophia Graf, who discuss the Weizenbaum-Institut’s DSA40 Collaboratory project. The EU’s Digital Services Act provides for research access to public and non-public data via its articles 40(12) and 40(4), and in both cases this is limited to research that investigates what is called ‘systemic risks’, and to Very Large Online Platforms which serve at least 10% of the EU population, which translates to 45 million users.

If platforms are found to have failed to provide such access, the EU can (and …

The next speaker at the Social Media Access Days at the German National Library is Robert Jäschke. He begins by noting the legal constraints on social media data sharing, including Terms of Service, copyright, and other restrictions. One approach to managing this is the way Twitter approached this: sharing datasets with lists of tweet IDs without any further content was allowed, and researchers then needed to ‘rehydrate’ them by regathering the tweet data. Another approach is to share only aggregate metrics rather than the source data themselves; or to share derived datasets (like term matrices, n-gram datasets, or word embeddings) …

And the next session at the Social Media Access Days at the German National Library starts with Ofra Klein, who will outline the challenges of studying far-right mobilisation in spite of the constraints of social media data access regimes. The far right use social media very extensively to promote their propaganda, and this can lead to physical demonstrations, riots, and violence; as and when this happens, social media posts and accounts are then often removed by the perpetrators of the platforms, complicating any meaningful research.

In addition, the number of platforms used for far-right agitation have diversified substantially; in addition …

Day Two at the Social Media Access Days in Frankfurt starts with my keynote, taking stock of how we access and engage with social media data nearly ten years after the drastic changes to many platforms' data access regimes following the 2018 Cambridge Analytica scandal. Back then, I wrote an article for Information, Communication & Society about the APIcalypse; how have things developed since then?

Here are my slides from the talk:

The final speaker at the Social Media Access Days at the German National Library today is Kristina Petzold, whose focus is on the question of whether music-related user-generated content can be seen as cultural heritage – this includes, for instance, some of the creative content generated and shared during the COVID-19 pandemic, and is part of post-digital everyday practice.

This includes content remixes, memes, and mashups, and is therefore highly referential; it is culturally relevant (and the cultural relevance of remix practices is now formally recognised under German law); but it is also highly ephemeral, especially where it exists in …

The next speakers in this session at the Social Media Access Days at the German National Library are Gabriel Viehhauser and Carl Friedrich Haak, whose interest is in making use of donated social media data – the concrete context here is that the Austrian author Clemens J. Setz, who has at times posted some of his short-form work on Twitter, has donated his archive of tweets to a library in Vienna, which was unsure about what to do with this gift.

Such work is diverse in its formats; further, Setz is author, but also interlocutor, curator, recipient, object of mentions …

The next speaker in this session at the Social Media Access Days at the German National Library is Catharina Ochsner, whose focus is on the archiving of scholarly blogs. Such blogs are engaged in science communication and thereby introduce more transparency into the scientific process; they exist in many different formats and across various major and minor platforms, and frequently link to each other and to other external resources.

But their long-term availability is limited, and depends on the blogger’s continued activity. There is a need for long-term archival of such resources in their original form, which also implies a …

The second session at the Social Media Access Days at the German National Library begins with a paper by Mia Berg and Oliver Vettermann, whose focus is on social media data scraping, with a particular focus on TikTok. TikTok does offer an API for data access (at least in Europe), but unfortunately it remains severely limited and unreliable; this is problematic given that many user practices and content formats are in urgent need of further analysis. One example of such a content genre is AI-generated video content, such as POV videos that purport to imagine historical situations.

Manual data gathering …