You are here

Politics

Prominent Themes in Data Sovereignty Debates Online

The final speaker in this ACSPRI 2024 conference session is Sidiq Madya, whose interest is in the discussion of the idea of data sovereignty by civil society organisations. Data sovereignty is a spectrum of approaches by nation states to subject data flows to national jurisdictions, and/or the ability or right of individuals to control their personal data and information.

Intersections between Alt-Right, Gamergate, and MAGA Subreddits

The next speaker in this ACSPRI 2024 conference session is Nicholas Corbett, whose focus is on ties between the alt-right, Gamergate, and the MAGA movement on Reddit. This entanglement has taken place for the best part of the past ten years or so, but exactly how strong are the links between these groups, and how does this manifest on Reddit’s?

Developing Bouquet Structure as a Network Analytics Measure

The second speaker in this ACSPRI 2024 conference session is Eve Cheng, whose interest is in party structures in parliamentary networks – party structures here means personal and professional backgrounds, including military and civilian careers, party memberships, educational track records, etc.

Assessing the Depth and Width of Deliberative Discussions Online

The second day at the ACSPRI 2024 conference dawns with a session on social network mapping, and starts with a paper by our wonderful conference chair Rob Ackland. This presents work on an international collaboration around technology and political communication, with a particular focus on social bots. This explores especially the potential for such bots to connect people with different ideas online, with the aim to improve public discourse.

Using LLMs to Assess Bullying in the Australian Parliament?

The next speaker in this ACSPRI 2024 conference session is Sair Buckle, whose interest is in the use of Large Language Models to detect bullying language in organisational contexts. Bullying is of course a major societal problem, including in companies, and presents a psychosocial hazard: there are several proposed approaches to address it, including surveys and interviews and manual linguistic classification (e.g. in federal parliament), which are subjective and manually intensive; pulse surveys and self-labelling questionnaires (e.g.

Fundamental Principles for Indigenous Data Sovereignty

From the AANZCA conference in Melbourne of the last few days I’ve moved on to the ACSPRI 2024 conference in Sydney for the rest of the week, which starts with a keynote by Maggie Walter, on methodologies for Indigenous statistics and quantitative research. Maggie is a Palawa woman from Tasmania. Data and population statistics have changed dramatically over the past decade or more; conventionally, Australian Indigenous people have been presented merely as average statistics that show what Maggie calls the Statistical Indigene: documenting prolonged disadvantage and inequality.

This is the case because these are the things we have data about: unemployment, imprisonment, health issues, etc. But these data are political: they are political artefacts that reflect a specific purpose, and position Indigenous people as hapless, helpless, and hopeless. This is a pejorative portrayal which is simplistic and undemanding of its audience; their presentation never advances beyond frequency tables and simplistic breakdowns (e.g. by gender or age). They define Indigenous people by the race they are not.

Maggie calls this ‘5D’ data: deficit, difference, disparity, disadvantage, and dysfunction. The aim may be to close the socioeconomic gap, but the aim is simply to bring Indigenous populations ‘up’ to a non-Indigenous level. And this pattern is not unique to Australia: the same is true for other (Anglo-)colonised nations, with many of the same deficits and dysfunctions identified – yet without ever acknowledging the underlying source of these patterns, which is Anglo-colonisation itself. This may be well-intentioned, but is nonetheless damaging.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Politics