Skip to main content
Home
Snurblog — Axel Bruns

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Information
  • Blog
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Presentations
  • Press
  • Creative
  • Search Site

Government

Snurb — Friday 26 April 2024 22:25

Tracing the Changing Nuclear Energy Debate in the German Twittersphere

Politics | Government | Polarisation | 'Big Data' | Social Media | Social Media Network Mapping | Twitter | FGZ RISC 2024 |

And the last speaker in this Indicators of Social Cohesion symposium is another local, Gregor Wiedemann, who is applying such Social Media Observatory approaches to the German debate about nuclear power. Nuclear energy slowly began to be phased out after the Fukushima disaster, but this has been challenged in recent times especially as a result of the energy crisis following the Russian attack on Ukraine, and some political actors are still calling for the (technologically impossible) reactivation of German nuclear power plants.

This is a useful case study of polarisation in public debate, and Gregor studied the dynamics of this …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Thursday 25 April 2024 18:02

Destructive Polarisation in the Voice to Parliament Referendum: A Preliminary Assessment

Politics | Elections | Government | Polarisation | Journalism | Industrial Journalism | ‘Fake News’ | Social Media | Echo Chambers and Filter Bubbles | Twitter | Dynamics of Partisanship and Polarisation in Online Public Debate (ARC Laureate Fellowship) | FGZ RISC 2024 |

It is an unseasonably cold Thursday morning in Hamburg, and after a great opening session last night with Aleksandra Urman, Mykola Makhortykh, and Jing Zeng we are now starting the first full day of the Indicators of Social Cohesion symposium. I’m presenting the morning keynote, on our current work assessing the news and social media debate around Australia’s failed Voice to Parliament referendum as a possible case of destructive polarisation.More on this as the research develops, but for now my slides are here:

Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case of the Australian Voice to Parliament …
» continue reading...
Snurb — Monday 22 April 2024 04:20

Are We Heading for Another Facebook News Ban?

Politics | Government | Journalism | Industrial Journalism | ‘Fake News’ | Social Media | Facebook |

Over the past month, Meta has been in the news again for its troubled relationship with news and news publishers in Australia and elsewhere, and several media outlets have asked me to provide some commentary on recent developments. Two major new announcements from Meta prompted this: first, the news that it would not renew its agreements with some Australian news publishers to voluntarily share a small amount of its advertising revenue with them; and second, the announcement that it would progressively downrank news content on Instagram.

This follows on, of course, from the brief ban of all news content on …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Saturday 24 February 2024 00:43

Patterns in Commenting on the YouTube Videos of Alexey Navalny

Politics | Government | Polarisation | Social Media | Streaming Media | I-POLHYS 2024 |

The final speaker in this I-POLHYS 2024 session, and indeed the symposium overall, is Aidar Zinnatullin, who shifts our focus to Russia. This will examine the period in Russia before the full-scale invasion of Ukraine (from 2015 to 2021), when it was already a depoliticised society under authoritarian leadership and political stability was the central mantra of Putin’s rule. The implied social contract here was to provide increased prosperity for the people as long as they did not become politically active.

The Russian opposition under Alexey Navalny managed to cut through this stasis by producing popular and engaging content and …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Saturday 24 February 2024 00:41

Politicians and Media as Influencers of Social Media Polarisation during the Qatargate Scandal

Politics | Government | Polarisation | Journalism | Industrial Journalism | Social Media | Facebook | I-POLHYS 2024 |

The next speaker in this I-POLHYS 2024 session is Rita Marchetti, who shifts our attention to another scandal: the Qatargate case. She notes the limited attention of media scholars to corruption issues, even in spite of growing funding for anticorruption studies of legacy media – the potential role of social media in anticorruption activism has received very limited attention, in particular. There is more interest from economics than media scholars in this, it seems.

Italy has long been perceived as suffering from corruption, and this is frustrating citizens and politicians – but recent corruption indices do document that corruption remains …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Saturday 24 February 2024 00:40

How the Tangentopoli Corruption Scandal Turbocharged Italian Media Populism

Politics | Government | Polarisation | Journalism | Industrial Journalism | I-POLHYS 2024 |

The final session at the I-POLHYS 2024 symposium in Bologna starts with Marco Mazzoni, whose focus is on media populism – and he centres his presentation on the politicisation of the Tangentopoli corruption scandal as a media event in the early 1990s, which became the starting-point of media populism in Italy.

The scandal evolved during 1992-4, and ended the careers of several prominent politicians. It started with the arrest of a local politician, Mario Chiesa, in Milan, but was transformed into a national media event when the secretary of the Italian Socialist Party Bettino Craxi was drawn into the scandal …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Friday 23 February 2024 22:04

How Trust in Political Institutions Informs Italian Citizens’ Attitudes towards the EU

Politics | Government | Polarisation | I-POLHYS 2024 |

The next session at the I-POLHYS 2024 symposium starts with Giuliano Bobba, whose focus is on Italian citizens’s attitudes towards the EU during the COVID-19 crisis. There has been a growing recognition of the importance and roles of European institutions, and their activities are entwined and sometimes conflict with the political agendas of national governments; this produces a dynamic of politicisation.

Determinants of support for the EU include a cost-benefit evaluation, economic and cultural dimensions, and party cues, and such questions are further heightened at times of crisis. Immediate utilitarian considerations focus on what benefits citizens receive from the EU …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Friday 23 February 2024 01:47

Diagnosing Destructive Polarisation in the Voice to Parliament Referendum

Politics | Elections | Government | Polarisation | Journalism | Industrial Journalism | Social Media | Facebook | Twitter | Dynamics of Partisanship and Polarisation in Online Public Debate (ARC Laureate Fellowship) | I-POLHYS 2024 |

And we’ll finish the day at I-POLHYS 2024 with my keynote, which builds on the work of my Australian Laureate Fellowship team to review the types of polarisation that have been identified in the literature and develop the concept of destructive polarisation as a particularly concerning stage of polarisation dynamics. Our research proposes five distinct symptoms of destructive polarisation – and in the keynote I reflect on the recent Australian referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament to explore to what extent these five symptoms of destructive polarisation were present in the news and digital media debates in the lead-up …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Friday 23 February 2024 01:32

The Operationalisation of ‘Gender Ideology’ Fears by Parties of the Italian Populist Radical Right

Politics | Government | Polarisation | I-POLHYS 2024 |

The final speaker in this session at I-POLHYS 2024 is Alessia Donà, whose focus is on the two parties of the populist radical right in Italy, Lega and Fratelli d’Italia. The populist radical right combines the thin ideology of populism with the thick ideology of nativism and nationalism: where populism often simply distinguishes between in- and out-groups, the radical right builds on xenophobia and positions foreigners as threats to the national identity and nation state, and positions authoritarianism as a solution to the problems of society.

This represents a politics of fear, presenting real or imagined threats that can build …

» continue reading...
Snurb — Wednesday 21 February 2024 05:07

Identifying the Symptoms of Destructive Polarisation (I-POLHYS 2024)

Politics | Elections | Government | Polarisation | Journalism | Industrial Journalism | Social Media | Facebook | Social Media Network Mapping | Twitter | Dynamics of Partisanship and Polarisation in Online Public Debate (ARC Laureate Fellowship) | I-POLHYS 2024 |
» continue reading...

Pagination

  • Previous page
  • 12
  • Next page
Government
INFORMATION
BLOG
RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS
PRESENTATIONS
PRESS
CREATIVE

Recent Work

Presentations and Talks

Beyond Interaction Networks: An Introduction to Practice Mapping (ACSPRI 2024)

» more

Books, Papers, Articles

Untangling the Furball: A Practice Mapping Approach to the Analysis of Multimodal Interactions in Social Networks (Social Media + Society)

» more

Opinion and Press

Inside the Moral Panic at Australia's 'First of Its Kind' Summit about Kids on Social Media (Crikey)

» more

Creative Work

Brightest before Dawn (CD, 2011)

» more

Lecture Series


Gatewatching and News Curation: The Lecture Series

Bluesky profile

Mastodon profile

Queensland University of Technology (QUT) profile

Google Scholar profile

Mixcloud profile

[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence]

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Licence.