Blog

The next speakers at the ECREA 2026 conference in Brno are Guna Spurava and Arjen van Dalen, with a focus on algorithmic content recommendations and media governance in the Nordic and Baltic region. Both perspectives may have valuable contributions to make here. Algorithmic content recommendation systems affect how people access news and information, and this is a challenge for media regulation; is there a new governance paradigm emerging here, or to regulators continue on established (and perhaps no longer appropriate) paths?

Communication values are normative principles about what communication should achieve; in the Nordic countries these extend overall welfare state …

The next speaker in this session at the ECREA 2026 conference in Brno is Neil Thurman, whose focus is on age verification legislation across various states in the US, and its effect on the consumption of online pornography by under-18s. This is observed here via clickstream data.

Concerns about online pornography are as old as the Internet itself, and were instrumental in the development of the controversial US Communication Decency Act (CDA), signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1996 and subsequently found to be unconstitutional; the US has not had any federal legislation to restrict online pornography since then …

The next panel at the ECREA 2026 conference in Brno that I’m attending is on social media platform practices, and it starts with a presentation by Steliyana Doseva and Danilo Harles, whose focus is on the handling of offensive content on social media. Social media provide many opportunities for communication, but this also includes the spread of problematic and offensive content. The EU Digital Services Act requires platforms to provide mechanisms for reporting such content, and to show how they address this content.

However, while the DSA creates a shared responsibility across the EU, contexts and reporting behaviours differ between …

The next speaker in this session at the ECREA 2026 conference in Brno is Ruth Wendt, who highlights the many uses that social media can be put to, and the many risks which critics have identified: opportunities for networking, social connection, peer support, information retrieval, etc. are juxtaposed with concerns about cyberbullying, child exploitation, misinformation, etc.

Studies to date have found only very weak association between time spent on social media and wellbeing, but studies on minors remain rare; social media bans in Australia and elsewhere are an unfortunate natural experiment which will shine further light on this. There are …

The next speaker in this session at the ECREA 2026 conference in Brno is the great Anja Bechmann, who adds some empirical data on how younger users are actually engaging with social media platforms. The focus here is on Danish users aged 18-35, and on YouTube, and on users with ‘deviant’ personality profiles including extroversion and neuroticism.

This study worked with some 1,000 Danish participants who donated log files of YouTube use and engaged in a 25-minute survey about their usage practices; this enabled the project to examine, for instance, the time spent on the platform at various times in …

The next speaker in this session at the ECREA 2026 conference in Brno is my QUT colleague Kim Osman. She presents a project by the Centre for the Digital Child, which actually consulted children and young people about their perspectives on the impending social media ban; this took place against the uncertain and shifting background of Australian policy-making, which was (and remains) unclear about the definition of ‘social media’ and prevaricated about which platforms would even be included in the ban (Facebook is; 4chan is not…).

In the end, this project conducted some 86 30-minute interviews with young people aged …

The next morning at the ECREA 2026 conference in Brno starts with our panel on the social media bans of young people in Australia and beyond, and our first speaker is the fabulous Sonia Livingstone, who focusses on the question of children’s rights. Bans of children from social media platforms are ultimately against children’s rights: they ban children rather than banning technologies (and in fact the UK government has now proposed a nightly curfew for children, too).

Such bans started with the one in Australia, but similar initiatives are also away across many European nations, as well as countries around …

And the final speaker in this panel at the ECREA 2026 conference in Brno is Moritz Bürger, whose focus is on the communication strategies of political actors as they legitimate their violence. This builds on a concept of legitimacy that emphasises conformity with existing rules, adherence to shared beliefs, and consent to power relationships.

Legitimisation statements can be analysed for speaker, object of legitimisation, evaluation, and argument; and hegemonial and subaltern positions can be distinguished here: hegemonial and subaltern decision-makers, insider challengers, and outsider challengers.

The focus here is on several contexts, where decision-makers include the US and Ukrainian president …

The next speaker in this session at the ECREA 2026 conference in Brno is Kateryna Maikovska, whose focus is on the communication of Ukrainian and Russian policymakers on Telegram. Especially during times of war, such platforms can be used for both mobilisation and manipulation, but more research is still required to understand current patterns. Telegram is playing a key role in the full-scale Russian war against Ukraine, of course, so this is the focus of this paper.

The paper examines the political communication of policymakers in both countries before and after the illegal full-scale invasion; it focusses on politicians who …

The next speaker in this session at the ECREA 2026 conference in Brno is Konstiantyn Yanchenko, whose focus is on social actors on Telegram. In Europe, Telegram is used as a source of news specially in southern countries (Spain, Italy, Serbia, Turkey), and features a degree of institutionalisation: there are news outlets, government institutions, politicians, as well as influencers and individual, sometimes anonymous users; in democracies as well as autocracies, it also provides a platform for alternative and dissident voices.

What identity cues do Telegram actors provide, then? What external information is available about them? Do these match the actual …