Skip to main content
Home
Snurblog — Axel Bruns

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Information
  • Blog
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Presentations
  • Press
  • Creative
  • Search Site

Mainstream and Fringe Campaigners’ Populist Communication Styles in Germany and Czechia

Snurb — Monday 7 September 2026 23:25
Politics | Elections | Polarisation | Social Media | Facebook | Twitter | ECREA 2026 | Liveblog |

We’re into the final panel at the DigiWorld network ECREA preconference on election campaigning in Brno, and I’ll be the final presenter (with slides coming soon). We start, though, with Jan Křovák, whose focus is on populism in the 2025 German and Czech elections.

He begins by describing populism as a communication strategy which is anti-elite and against out-groups, and which has become more mainstream in recent years – mainstream parties confronted by populist challengers have increasingly adopted populist rhetoric, while populist parties themselves have also become more mainstream in their electoral appeal.

This has played out very differently in Germany and the Czech Republic so far; in Germany, the AfD has been very successful but firewalled from coalitions with other parties; in Czechia, the current government is a coalition of three populist parties.

This analysis examines posts from Facebook, Instagram, and X across the last two weeks of each election campaign; it manually codes for the presence of populist actors, topics, and strategies in these social media posts by the leading candidates. Ultimately, this codes posts across a scale from no or latent populist communication to soft or hard populism.

This classification takes two routes: 16 thematic categories are classified as soft or hard populism, and their presence per post is aggregated; but explicit othering and dehumanising of out-groups is an instant trigger for a hard populism categorisation.

Some populist communication is present across all candidate accounts, but its extent differs widely. The Czech mainstream actors, facing imminent defeat, included considerable levels of manifest populism; German mainstream actors, still slated to form government, showed far less manifest populism, and no hard populism at all. Shared across mainstream and populist parties were people-centrism, emotionalisation, informality, and visual people-centrism; unique to populists were divides between the people and the elite, out-group othering, and other strategies.

Some populist actors were very consistent in their hard populism, while others mixed highly populist and more mainstream posting styles. Some populist actors in the Czech Republic who were likely to win the election also toned down their communication style, presumably in order to attract a larger share of the vote.

  • 4 views
INFORMATION
BLOG
RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS
PRESENTATIONS
PRESS
CREATIVE

Recent Work

Presentations and Talks

Revisiting ‘the’ Public Sphere and Its Algorithmically Shaped Publics (ZeMKI ComAI 2026)

» more

Books, Papers, Articles

Untangling the Furball: A Practice Mapping Approach to the Analysis of Multimodal Interactions in Social Networks (Social Media + Society)

» more

Opinion and Press

Breaking through Infoglut: The Anger-Information Overload Cycle (360info)

» more

Creative Work

Brightest before Dawn (CD, 2011)

» more

Lecture Series


Gatewatching and News Curation: The Lecture Series

Bluesky profile

Mastodon profile

Queensland University of Technology (QUT) profile

Google Scholar profile

Mixcloud profile

[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence]

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Licence.