Blog

As you might have noticed, the red box that's currently at the top of my blog has grown a little more today - I can now confirm a couple more events as part of my iDC residency in New York (even though these events themselves won't be in NYC...). David Marshall has invited me to participate in a panel discussion at Northeastern University in Boston (12 October, 12 noon), and Mark Tribe has asked me to present my 'Understanding the Produser' lecture at Brown University in Providence (12 October, 5 p.m.), so I'll be doing a bit of a New England railway roundtrip that day.

(Toronto) Well, after all the excitement of the Creative Places + Spaces conference over the last couple of days, today is my day off in Toronto, and I've used it to wander all over town. Toronto is an extremely easy place to get around in, and it's impossible to get lost - the city is neatly divided into a western and an eastern half by Yonge Street, which runs from the lakeshore all the way through town, and on, all up for around 1900km in total! Other than that, the place feels like a bit of a mixed bag to me - big modern shopping centres, office buildings, and hotels are interspersed with dingy strips of shops and a lot of building sites, with little sense of a real centre; the city is also somewhat disconnected from its lakeshore by the rail line and Gardiner Expressway, as well as a large number of parking lots around the baseball and hockey stadiums. And even on Yonge St, as soon as you get just slightly away from the big shopping centres almost every other shop seems to be a sex shop - Torontonians must be a randy lot...

Well, it's the final session of this very exciting conference. Charles Landry and Pier Giorgio di Cicco will do the wrap-up. Charles reflects on the process of starting a revolution - from the individual idea to the broad movement. It is an extended transformative moment, but the question is whether it will linger long and lastingly, so that a legacy is created. He suggests that the resolution has already started, as the many projects mentioned along the way over the last couple of days show - and these are the generators for further action.

And finally we're in the last plenary session for the conference, on the power of new ideas. This is a panel deliberately of people aged 40 or under, to demonstrate that there is a strong future in this creative industries area. This is facilitated by the multitalented Canadian cultural entrepreneur Sharon Lewis, who now introduces the speakers.

Peter MacLeod: Towards Creative Security

Peter MacLeod makes a start; he is the principal of The Planning Desk in Vancouver. He has recently returned from a tour of Canada to investigate the civic infrastructure of the nation, and suggests that both risk and resolution are inherently political ideas. In addition to creative risk, there also is a need for creative security, in analogy to social security: states exist to mitigate risk (especially risk of violence), which is why the violence seen in New Orleans recently was so alarming, and states are indeed perhaps only relevant for the security they provide. However, government has fallen into a rut, always dealing with the same political problems, and the idea that government is a problem and necessarily inept has become all too prevalent.

This is a conference on the move - from the posh (and very old-fashioned) surroundings of the Fairmont Royal York Hotel Concert Hall we have now been bussed to Toronto's historic distillery district - a rejuvenated area east of the city centre where grand old distillery and factory buildings have been converted into cafes, restaurants, boutiques, and events spaces. Clearly the sort of creative space everyone at this conference has been talking about. I'm now in the Fermenting Cellar, waiting for the start of the 'Creative City-Building' session; this involves two parts with Arian Hassani, and speakers from Toronto, London, Munich, and beyond.

The next session at Creative Places + Spaces is called 'The Art of Creating Beautiful Places' - a panel involving five speakers mainly from Toronto itself. Lance Alexander from the City Manager's Office in Toronto makes a start. He begins by discussing the question of beauty itself - is there a common definition for what a beautiful city is, and therefore how policy and urban development could aim to build one? Architect Mark McClelland suggests that for buildings this is perhaps also a question of age - when they're built they might be in fashion or close to fashion, and fall out of fashion later on; if they survive long enough it may be possible for them to be seen as beautiful, iconic, and timeless - and even historic - again.

My afternoon was spent presenting the Creative Industries Faculty and especially my work in KKB018 Creative Industries with the Ipskay Creative Town scenario at the CP+S Creativity Marketplace. Unfortunately DHL messed up, so my QUT brochures never arrived at the hotel, but with the materials and student posters I brought along I think I had enough information to go on. I ended up running out of business cards (and out of voice), so that' s a great indication of strong interest in what we're doing. Also, good to meet a few fellow travellers - some of the folks from the Danish Kaospilots group, as well as some lecturers from the University of Breda in the Netherlands who have also developed a creative industries programme. I'll have to follow up to see if a student exchange between them and us is feasible.

Charles Landry, author of The Creative City, is the keynote speaker this morning. He notes how creativity has become something of a universal mantra, and is generally seen as entirely good and positive. It may be important to take a more critical view of creativity now, and especially of the claims to creativity which so many cities now make. Most creative city strategies are about enhancing the arts as well as the creative industries, which is fine, but what's important is also to expand from this - what would be a creative bureaucrat, or a creative environmentalist?

The idea of the creative community, the creative city, is different - it is far more all-embracing, and encourages openness and tolerance and thus has massive implications for organisational culture which must be addressed. It is important to create environments where we can think, plan, and act with imagination - where ordinary people can act in extraordinary ways if given the chance. One of the principles is to involve those affected in creative city plans. This means thinking on the edge of your competence rather than at the centre of it. Innovation happens at the boundary of difference, where things can really start to occur. This means asking practitioners to act in slightly different ways from their established practice. The creative city, then, is an attitude of mind; it is dynamic, not static. Landry argues for a culture of creativity to be embedded in the places in which people live.