I am the final speaker in this Social Media & Society 2018 session, presenting a paper co-authored with Christian Nuernbergk and Aljosha Karim Schapals, my colleagues in the Journalism beyond the Crisis ARC Discovery project. Here are our slides:

The third speaker in this Social Media & Society 2018 session is Johan Farkas, whose focus is on the activities of the Internet Research Agency (IRA) in St. Petersburg, described as the Russian ‘troll factory’ and indicted for its involvement in Russian interference with the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

There are three forms of propaganda that have been identified in past literature: ‘white’ propaganda has a known source; ‘grey’ propaganda has an obfuscated source; and ‘black’ propaganda claims to be from a legitimate source but isn’t. Is this a useful classification in this context? Do the processes of propaganda dissemination …

The final speaker in this Social Media & Society 2018 session is Andra Siibak, whose interest is in opinion polarisation on social media and the question of whether these constitute ‘echo chambers’ or ‘filter bubbles’. Individual abilities and digital literacies might affect the extent to which users find themselves in such environments, or are aware of them. Andra examined this in the context of an anti-immigration Facebook community in Estonia.

Estonians are particularly strong Internet (and social media) users; this is especially pronounced for younger Estonians. When the European refugee crisis emerged, this manifested in the rapid creation of various …

The third speaker in this Social Media & Society 2018 session is Lea Stahel, who begins with the story of two Muslim schoolkids in a Swiss school, who refused to shake the hand of their female teacher for cultural reasons. This was settled quickly within the school itself, but was raised again out of context by online media coverage some three months after the event, demonstrating how non-mediated and mediated contexts can diverge in the digital age.

There is a perception of legitimacy at the macro-level that influences particular publics’ judgments and actions, and that is affected in turn by …

The next paper in this Social Media and Society 2018 session is by Michael Bossetta, Chris Zimmermann, and Anamaria Dutceac Segesten, whose interest is in patterns in post-Brexit Facebook discussions. In particular, what is the role of emotions in these discussions, and what are their implications? The project gathered data using the Vox Populi data collection, enhanced with other data.

The analysis employed SentiStrength and other sentiment detection algorithms to assess the sentiment, emotionality, arousal, core emotions, and fine-grained feelings in Facebook posts from three major Facebook pages related to the Brexit referendum; most of the discussion took place here …

The final session at Social Media & Society 2018 today is one I’m moderating, and starts with a paper by Ivan Kalmar, Nicholas Worby who explores the connections between Islamophobia and antisemitism in extremist online communication. Islamophobic politicians go to great lengths to claim that they are not antisemitic, in order not to be painted as fascists, yet give enough hints to their followers to still be seen as anti-Jewish.

One of the common targets in this complicated manoeuvre is George Soros, the Hungarian-Jewish billionaire who is generally accused of funding liberal civil society institutions and has been attacked by …

The next speaker in this ICA 2018 session is Chenjerai Kumanyika, who notes his growing scepticism about the effectiveness of visual protest media. We must pay more attention to the changes that are occurring at this time, and to what new interventions still work.

There is a particular need to the visual ways in which media activism reproduces existing media tropes, and how else such activism may be presented. There are elements in such videos that may work against the analyses that are now required: the videos constantly tether us to the present; they do not enable us to reflect …

The next speaker at ICA 2018 is Sarah Banet-Weiser, who begins by highlighting the popular Trump masks now available for purchase. What does it mean to see through Trump in such a way – more generally, what is the authenticity of Trump’s persona?

Trump is a serial misogynist, who has serially attacked, abused, and insulted women, in public and apparently without sanction; we appear to have got used to such misogyny and barely even respond to it any more. His abuse circulates in the mainstream and social media, and enables the routine dismissal of such misogyny as ‘locker room talk’ …

The next speaker in this very fast-paced ICA 2018 session is Jayson Harsin, whose interest is in the emergence of post-truth or emo-truth in the context of the Trump Presidency. Post-truth appeals to emotion and personal belief rather than facts; this is a periodising term that refers to a widespread culture of distrust in an era of channel fragmentation and the emergence of micro-truthtellers who dine out on such emotional appeals.

This is powerfully connected to cynicism and distrust in a new, hypercapitalist, neo-liberal environment and builds on aggressive, strategic, political communication apparatuses. Distrust is now at a record high …