Skip to main content
Home
Snurblog — Axel Bruns

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Information
  • Blog
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Presentations
  • Press
  • Creative
  • Search Site

Simulating In- and Out-Group Engagement with LLM Chatbots

Snurb — Thursday 12 June 2025 00:41
Politics | Polarisation | Artificial Intelligence | Social Media | Bots Building Bridges 2025 | Liveblog |

The next speakers in this Bots Building Bridges workshop session are Ozgur Can Seckin and Bao Truong, who begin by outlining the issue of political polarisation – especially in the United States. They distinguish between polarisation on specific issues on the one hand, and affective polarisation between the partisans supporting various political groups on the other; this latter form of polarisation is therefore a problem of in-group and out-group exposure and engagement.

Some approaches have sought to address this by increasing exposure to out-group content and perspectives; some have attempted to encourage people to imagine the views of the other side; some have tried to correct misperceptions of the out-group; and some have sought to foster inter-group communication across partisan camps. The idea here is that same-party conversations can intensify polarisation, while disagreement can decrease it – however, poorly moderated or managed inter-group communication can also backfire and intensify perceptions of differences between the different sides.

Critical here is congruence: disagreement from in-group members lowers perceptions of in-group homogeneity; agreement from out-group members lowers perceptions of out-group difference and extremity (and thus positive feelings towards the in-groups) – and both produce cognitive dissonance (and thus negative feelings towards the out-group).

The project seeks to test these assumptions using Large Language Models: LLMs are able to realistically model the expression of partisan interlocutors, and an observation of the engagement of human participants with such partisan LLM agents in a discussion about current political issues can explore the short-term effects of such conversations on the participants’ perceptions of their in- or out-group.

Before this can be done in practice, however, it is also important to ensure that the chatbot is reliably performing the political character assigned to it; safeguards to prevent inappropriate behaviour will also be required. This can also be tested by getting two chatbots to talk to each other, with one of the simulating the human participant. Initial test results are encouraging, and the next step is now to move to tests with human participants.

  • 3 views
INFORMATION
BLOG
RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS
PRESENTATIONS
PRESS
CREATIVE

Recent Work

Presentations and Talks

Beyond Interaction Networks: An Introduction to Practice Mapping (ACSPRI 2024)

» more

Books, Papers, Articles

Untangling the Furball: A Practice Mapping Approach to the Analysis of Multimodal Interactions in Social Networks (Social Media + Society)

» more

Opinion and Press

Inside the Moral Panic at Australia's 'First of Its Kind' Summit about Kids on Social Media (Crikey)

» more

Creative Work

Brightest before Dawn (CD, 2011)

» more

Lecture Series


Gatewatching and News Curation: The Lecture Series

Bluesky profile

Mastodon profile

Queensland University of Technology (QUT) profile

Google Scholar profile

Mixcloud profile

[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence]

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Licence.