The difference, though one of degrees, between traditionalists and progressives also links
back to the discussion of the fate of the local in a globalising environment. Here, the Prog
traditionalists are equivalent to those elements in society attempting to hang on to the
traditional grounding of the 'local' in a geographic local; they are defenders of the status
quo. The progressives, on the other hand, are cosmopolitans, in Hannerz's terminology:
|
Bit 19
|
the perspective of the cosmopolitan must entail relationships to a plurality of
cultures understood as distinctive entities. ... But furthermore, cosmopolitanism
in a stricter sense includes a stance toward diversity itself, toward the coexistence
of cultures in the individual experience. A more genuine cosmopolitanism is first
of all an orientation, a willingness to engage with the Other. It is an intellectual
and aesthetic stance of openness toward divergent cultural experiences, a search
for contrasts rather than uniformity. To become acquainted with more cultures
is to turn into an aficionado, to view them as art works. (239)
|
|
Bit 20
|