"Every Home Is Wired":
2 -- The Progressive Rock Subculture and the Net
<

A History of Progressive Rock
As Prog is such a widely spread and heterogeneous genre, an outline of its development over the last three decades will help to uncover the reasons for this structure, and to show unifying subcultural tendencies. A timetable of stylistic and subcultural trends is useful here: Bit 13
TimeMusical StylesSubcultural Structures
late 1960s early canonical bands in the U.K., unstructured stylistic experimentation rise from British art schools, strong links with bourgeois counterculture8
early 1970s commercial success (centrally, Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon, 1973), attracting growing music industry interest9, tours of the U.S.10 strong consumerism; especially in the U.S. recognition of a distinct artistic genre, and need to rely on U.K. music imports and information resources11
mid-1970s division into bands continuing musical experimentation (creating a widening range of styles), and those continuing in their established styles (the latter also encouraged by the music industry), internal division in bands also leads to band break-ups and lineup changes12 gradual subsiding of countercultural ideas due to increasing cynicism, growing alienation of musicians from their fans; also because of the bands' commercial success, which leads to increased use of larger stadiums, and on-stage props and effects
late 1970s some unsuccessful industry-led salvage attempts, continuing through the 1980s, by forming 'Prog supergroups' like U.K. and Asia13; advent of punk14 continued disenchantment with the increasingly commercial output of major bands, but still support for some smaller, 'underground' sub-genres
early and mid-1980s style vacuum after the implosion of the punk movement, in Britain emerging neo-Prog bands from the underground scene; King Crimson reforms in 1981, other older bands produce pop music sufficient audience in Britain and continental Europe, made up both of original Prog fans and a second generation, little U.S. success; division into traditionalists and progressives
Bit 14

Section 2 -- Go on to Bite:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

<

© 1998 Axel Bruns