Skip to main content
Home
Snurblog — Axel Bruns

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Information
  • Blog
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Presentations
  • Press
  • Creative
  • Search Site

Challenging the Dominant Knowledge Order and Its Conceptualisation of Mis- and Disinformation

Snurb — Monday 24 June 2024 16:10
Politics | ‘Fake News’ | ICA 2024 |

The final presenter at the ICA 2024 conference is Florian Primig, whose interest is in how we make sense of misinformation. He participated in an expert citizen council in Germany that explored the question of misinformation, which sparked him to rethink these concepts – we ought to try some critical introspection and consider the societal factors that have challenged the established knowledge order and enabled the emergence of counter-knowledge orders.

That emergence is not necessarily a bad thing; the primacy of knowledge has always been problematic. Instead of citizens we are now seen as life-long learners, and this requires us to perceive and perform as knowers. But this is constraining; the constraints of the existing knowledge order are incompatible with the imperative to know.

The imperative to know builds on the presuppositions of the knowledge order; we are called upon to be responsible and align with the presuppositions of the established knowledge order. While the availability of the Internet enables us to draw knowledge and learn from others, but it is also overwhelming and makes such learning difficult; navigating the conditions of the strong epistemic responsibility that are demanded of us is difficult, especially where empirical evidence is unsettled.

This also requires us to think about power, which determines what is and is not acceptable, and indeed defines what is seen as mis- and disinformation. Where the state determines what is acceptable, pushing back against this knowledge order can be dangerous for the individual. Counterpublics, too, actively challenge the established knowledge order; but in mainstream publics there can be epistemic violence enacted upon individuals and groups, too, and this might drive individuals towards counterpublics and fringe groups, in fact.

This represents a struggle for epistemic hegemony, and contingency in the knowledge order is back. Counter-knowledge orders construct alternative hierarchies, in response to the dominant order, and provide access to alternative knowledge structures, and their bland dismissal perpetuates the illusion that the hegemonic order is always right. Immunising the established knowledge order against such counter-orders will not do; a more sophisticated approach is required here.

(Not sure I did that full justice – this was dense with ideas, and presented without slides to signpost the discussion. Anyway, that’s the end of the ICA conference…)

  • 269 views
INFORMATION
BLOG
RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS
PRESENTATIONS
PRESS
CREATIVE

Recent Work

Presentations and Talks

Beyond Interaction Networks: An Introduction to Practice Mapping (ACSPRI 2024)

» more

Books, Papers, Articles

Untangling the Furball: A Practice Mapping Approach to the Analysis of Multimodal Interactions in Social Networks (Social Media + Society)

» more

Opinion and Press

Inside the Moral Panic at Australia's 'First of Its Kind' Summit about Kids on Social Media (Crikey)

» more

Creative Work

Brightest before Dawn (CD, 2011)

» more

Lecture Series


Gatewatching and News Curation: The Lecture Series

Bluesky profile

Mastodon profile

Queensland University of Technology (QUT) profile

Google Scholar profile

Mixcloud profile

[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence]

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Licence.