Skip to main content
Home
Snurblog — Axel Bruns

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Information
  • Blog
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Presentations
  • Press
  • Creative
  • Search Site

How the ICE Deportations of the Second Trump Administration Are Covered Internationally

Snurb — Friday 28 November 2025 10:04
Politics | Government | Polarisation | Journalism | Industrial Journalism | AANZCA 2025 | Liveblog |

And the final day at the AANZCA 2025 conference starts with a session on transnational news that begins with Niusha Hansel and Linda Jean Kenix. Their study examines news coverage of the Trump administration’s deployment of ICE to deport migrants. Some 600,000 undocumented immigrants have (supposedly) been deported during the first year of Trump’s second term, and a total of 2 million have left the US; this has also caused widespread protests, including the No Kings protests across the country.

How has this been reported internationally, across English-speaking countries UK, Canada, Australia, Philippines, Nigeria, and India? Common to these are broadly negative views towards immigration, and Australia, Canada, and the UK have broadly negative views towards the USA by now; this is still very different for India, the Philippines, and Nigeria.

This study examined news coverage since December 2024, which covers several events during the first year of the administration including the illegal arrests and deportations of several US citizens and residents, various protests, and the deployment of the National Guard in several states. Media coverage was especially pronounced in India and the UK, followed at some distance by Canada and Australia; the other countries paid considerably less attention to these developments.

These articles were coded for their coverage approaches; countries differed on which stakeholder groups were featured, how ICE was presented (more negatively in Canada, the UK, and Australia), how protesters were represented (the reverse), whether the central frame was thematic conflict (yes), and more.

There is a strong link here with the perception of immigration in these countries; across all six countries, ICE was not the primary topic, even if it was depicted negatively – politics, protests, and immigration were positioned as the central topics here, and experts or citizens were rarely positioned as key stakeholders. Protesters were depicted positively unless protests turned violent, at which point the depiction of ICE also improved.

Sentiments turned more negative when countries’ own citizens were deported, and – in the case of Canada – also when Trump floated the annexation of Canada as a 51st state. Overall, negative attributes came to correlate with each other too.

  • 7 views
INFORMATION
BLOG
RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS
PRESENTATIONS
PRESS
CREATIVE

Recent Work

Presentations and Talks

Beyond Interaction Networks: An Introduction to Practice Mapping (ACSPRI 2024)

» more

Books, Papers, Articles

Untangling the Furball: A Practice Mapping Approach to the Analysis of Multimodal Interactions in Social Networks (Social Media + Society)

» more

Opinion and Press

Inside the Moral Panic at Australia's 'First of Its Kind' Summit about Kids on Social Media (Crikey)

» more

Creative Work

Brightest before Dawn (CD, 2011)

» more

Lecture Series


Gatewatching and News Curation: The Lecture Series

Bluesky profile

Mastodon profile

Queensland University of Technology (QUT) profile

Google Scholar profile

Mixcloud profile

[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence]

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Licence.