Skip to main content
Home
Snurblog — Axel Bruns

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Information
  • Blog
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Presentations
  • Press
  • Creative
  • Search Site

Affective Polarisation in Political Leaders' Discourses: A Comparison between Australia, Brazil, Denmark, and Perú (ICA 2023)

Snurb — Sunday 9 July 2023 05:22
Politics | Elections | Government | Filesharing | Social Media | Twitter | Dynamics of Partisanship and Polarisation in Online Public Debate (ARC Laureate Fellowship) | ICA 2023 |

ICA 2023

Affective Polarisation in Political Leaders' Discourses: A Comparison between Australia, Brazil, Denmark, and Perú

Sebastian Svegaard, Tariq Choucair, Kate O'Connor Farfan, and Axel Bruns

  • 25 May 2023 – Paper presented at the ICA 2023 preconference Comparative Digital Political Communication: Comparisons across Countries, Platforms, and Time, Toronto

Presentation Slides

Affective polarisation in political leaders' discourses from Svegaard1

Abstract

In this paper, we assess the social media communication strategies of the two main contenders in four national elections in 2021 and 2022. Our analysis focuses on the role of affective polarisation in these election campaigns and the relationship/s between polarisation and political systems.

The target countries represent different electoral and political systems, from the strictly presidential system in Brazil to Perú’s presidential system with multiple lower-profile candidates; from Australia’s multi-party system dominated by two party blocs to the more diverse multi-party system in Denmark. This diversity in systems should be reflected in different patterns of partisanship and polarisation.

Different conditions may therefore offer both candidates and their supporters diverging incentives to engage in polarising rhetoric. In systems that are highly focussed on individual leaders there may be a tendency to develop a clear distinction between ‘us’ and ‘them’, while multi-party systems, in contrast, offer a wider range of possible fault lines with more fine-grained us-versus-them constructions, potentially resulting in a more multi-sided rather than dyadic network of polarisations.

Building on comprehensive datasets of the posts by political leaders on Facebook and Twitter in each of these national elections, we investigate the relative presence and discursive operationalisation of affective language, and in this paper present a systematic comparison between the patterns for these four nations. This produces new insights into the interrelationship between affective polarisation and the structures of electoral and political systems.

  • 596 views
INFORMATION
BLOG
RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS
PRESENTATIONS
PRESS
CREATIVE

Recent Work

Presentations and Talks

Beyond Interaction Networks: An Introduction to Practice Mapping (ACSPRI 2024)

» more

Books, Papers, Articles

Untangling the Furball: A Practice Mapping Approach to the Analysis of Multimodal Interactions in Social Networks (Social Media + Society)

» more

Opinion and Press

Inside the Moral Panic at Australia's 'First of Its Kind' Summit about Kids on Social Media (Crikey)

» more

Creative Work

Brightest before Dawn (CD, 2011)

» more

Lecture Series


Gatewatching and News Curation: The Lecture Series

Bluesky profile

Mastodon profile

Queensland University of Technology (QUT) profile

Google Scholar profile

Mixcloud profile

[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence]

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Licence.