Skip to main content
Home
Snurblog — Axel Bruns

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Information
  • Blog
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Presentations
  • Press
  • Creative
  • Search Site

Comparing User Participation Functionality in Flemish and German Newspaper Sites

Snurb — Friday 15 October 2010 18:30
Journalism | Gatewatching and Citizen Journalism | Industrial Journalism | ECREA 2010 |

Hamburg.
The final speakers in this very engaging morning session at ECREA 2010 are Jeroen de Keyser and Annika Sehl, presenting a comparison of German and Flemish efforts to encourage public participation in the news media. To begin with, there clearly are increases in the online activities of ‘ordinary’ people, for example through blogs, social networking, and citizen journalism; some traditional media offer similar tools to also encourage participatory journalism activities. Such participation may take place at various stages of the journalistic process (input, output, commentary), and tools which enable participation at different stages are differently popular amongst journalists; there still is relatively limited conversation of journalists with the public overall.

The present study examined the current situation in Flanders and Germany, then. In 2008 and 2010, it analysed the participatory tools available on journalism Websites to examine the structural characteristics of audience participation, comparing eight national newspaper Websites each in Flanders and Germany.

For Flanders, the study found that feedback tools (polls, instant feedback, etc.) were offered most frequently in both years; between 2008 and 2010, there was also a substantial increase in redistribution tools (to share content across social networking services). Additionally, citizen news contributions became more prominent on Flemish news sites, especially for media with strong local ties. Citizen blogs remained rare on newspaper sites, and there were only few tools which would require significant journalistic monitoring (photo submission functionality, discussion fora, etc.) – there was even some decline here.

In Germany, too, there were many feedback functions (pools, instant feedback, letters to the editor), with a small increase since 2008; redistribution tools are also standard now. Many sites have citizen fora for discussion about specific topics – some moderated, some not. Citizen Weblogs are rare here, too, and there are some tools that do require stronger journalistic monitoring.

Overall, then, the results are fairly similar across both nations; both follow a similar journalistic model and culture, of course. There was faster adoption of most online tools in Flanders, though, and Flemish media were seen to be less distant and more locally tied to their users, offering a few citizen reporter sections, for example. German media are financially stronger, on the other hand, enabling them to offer some more sophisticated functionality.

Implementing change may be easier in smaller news organisations (in Flanders), then, and citizen participation functionality may be more effective for papers with a smaller market size and thus greater local attachment. On the other hand, larger organisations will find it easier to sustain participatory functionality: filtering user contributions comes at a cost, and this puts the larger (German) news organisations at a distinct advantage.

  • 3698 views
INFORMATION
BLOG
RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS
PRESENTATIONS
PRESS
CREATIVE

Recent Work

Presentations and Talks

Beyond Interaction Networks: An Introduction to Practice Mapping (ACSPRI 2024)

» more

Books, Papers, Articles

Untangling the Furball: A Practice Mapping Approach to the Analysis of Multimodal Interactions in Social Networks (Social Media + Society)

» more

Opinion and Press

Inside the Moral Panic at Australia's 'First of Its Kind' Summit about Kids on Social Media (Crikey)

» more

Creative Work

Brightest before Dawn (CD, 2011)

» more

Lecture Series


Gatewatching and News Curation: The Lecture Series

Bluesky profile

Mastodon profile

Queensland University of Technology (QUT) profile

Google Scholar profile

Mixcloud profile

[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence]

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Licence.